So Facebook is buzzing about “Google Baby” which I keep wanting to call “Global Baby”. It is in my news feed over and over again as various members of the infertility/fertility community watch it on HBO. In case you didn’t know “Google Baby” is a new documentary on HBO exploring this new age of reproductive medicine – where people from around the world are connecting over the internet – and traveling the globe to build their families. “Google Baby” primary focuses on the newly coined term “reproductive outsourcing” of surrogacy and egg donation. Outsourcing? I guess Reproductive Tourism or even “Cross Border Fertility Treatment” is so yesterday.

“Outsourcing to India is very trendy right now,” observes Israeli entrepreneur Doron Mamet – who has is featured in the documentary. He talks in the film about how in Israel, it isn’t allowed for women to sell their eggs and makes it difficult for gay men to adopt. Mamet, a gay man and his partner traveled to the United States to do surrogacy – and found that most of his friends simply could not afford the price tag which hovered around$100,000 for the egg donor and the surrogate.
As a result of his life experience – Doron went into business and created a company that provides the service of combining embryos created in the U.S with surrogates from the clinic of fertility specialist Nayna Patel in Anand, India. And so we get to watch as Dr. Patel talks on the phone to a perspective client – while delivering a baby (I have seen a reproductive endocrinologist in the US talk on his phone while doing an egg retrieval), and counsel a perspective surrogate and her husband about the meat and potatoes of being a surrogate in India – mostly through Caesarian deliveries.
As opposed to US Surrogacy – the surrogates live in a home that Patel provides for the women – and they must leave their families and accept a sort of group confinement until they give birth and land over the babies. I was struck by how brave these soft spoken women who were the surrogates were and how determined. They were portrayed as mostly low-caste, and they were doing all of this – making this incredible sacrifice so that they could earn the money to buy a home or educate their children.
I wasn’t sure how to feel. But my stomach was in knots as my eyes couldn’t peel away from the television screen.
Yes – these women were paid a much lower wage then their US surrogate sisters – but their money seemed to go a lot farther. These women were changing their lives by giving life – and it was rough. They cried as they gave up the babies – it was wrenching. And then later – we get to see them happy in their new homes as their husbands plotted for them to go back to get the money for their child’s education. What to think? Were these women in power of their bodies – doing what they wanted to do to get what they wanted in life – or were they just being used again by forces bigger than themselves?
Can we say that about American egg donors and Surrogates? Is it so different – or does it just look different because in the US – the pay check is bigger – and the women get to live at home? Who is to judge? Film Director Zippi Brand Frank tries to give us a little cultural perspective by letting us see the overwhelmingly different life circumstances of an American egg donor “Kat,” who was using the money to fix up her large suburban home and buy guns. We get to watch her give herself injections of fertility drugs with her young daughter “assisting”. It was not exactly heart warming.
“Google Baby” makes sure to drive home the fact that this is a business – with lots of hands in the pot. And we are left with the question – Is there something inherently wrong or evil with the treatment of these women and the practice of international surrogacy and egg donation? Or dare I say it – how it is the same and different to what is happening in the US?
“Google Baby” also does the gay couple or the infertile couple – for whom this entire dance is not about business but something more primal a huge disservice. It is hard to remember watching this film that all of this is going on because people want to have families – and often cannot. And that many people are trying to build a family with limited means and no health insurance. It is the coarseness of the opening statement of “Google Baby” that totally set me off:
“Today’s New Technologies have taken the sex out of the act of making babies Now all you need is a credit card and the instructions can be found on You Tube”.
The complete lack of understanding of the infertile couple’s experience was shown in that opening statement of “Google Baby”. In fact it showed the same deep disregard for the infertile trying desperately to have a baby – as Dr. Patel showed for her patient when she chose to take a call from a potential client as her hands were in the belly of a surrogate while stitching her up from her Cesarean section. The surrogate was crying with the loss of the baby – her hands gently reaching for one touch of that babies head as he was taken from her. Dr. Patel seemed to hardly skip a beat.
In the end – we are left with women making incredible sacrifices for each other – and their families – while the business of reproductive medicine marches on.
Posted under "Cross Border Fertility Treatment", "Google Baby", Egg Donation, Egg Donor Compensation, Facebook, Fertility, Infertility, Queer Families, Recession and Fertility, Recession and Fertility Treatment, Surrogacy, birth, egg donors, embryos
This post was written by pmadsen on June 22, 2010
Tags: "Google Baby", birth, Donor Compensation, Doron Mamet, Egg Donation, Egg Donor, Fertility Drugs, Gad Levy, Gay Men, HBO, India Surrogacy, Nayna Patel, Pregnancy, Surrogacy, Surrogate, Zippi Brand Frank